TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

McKeen v. Haxtun

Wm. R. McKeen v. Wm. E. Haxtun, Ex'r, &c.

McKeen v. Haxtun, 25 Kan. 698 (1881)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Kansas · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 15, 1881
Citations
25 Kan. 698
Summary
At the April Term, 1880, of the district court of Linn county, defendant Haxtun, executor and trustee of the estate of Elnathan Haxtun, deceased, had judgment against plaintiff McKeen, who brings the case here.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam:

This was an action brought by William R. McKeen against William E. Haxtun, to set aside a certain tax deed, and to quiet plaintiff’s title to the land described in the tax deed. The decision of the court below was in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, except that the tax deed was to be set aside and the plaintiff’s title ■quieted upon condition that he should pay to the defendant all the taxes, with costs and interest, reasonably chargeable against the land and paid by the defendant. Plaintiff brings the case to this court, and claims that the court below erred in adding said condition to the judgment, and in failing and refusing to render judgment absolutely in his favor.

There is no new question involved in this case. Every question fairly presented has been considered and settled by this court in other cases. (Knox v. Dunn, 22 Kas. 683 ; Fairbanks v. Williams, 24 Kas. 16 ; Corbin v. Young, 24 Kas. 198, 202 ; Millbank v. Ostertag, 24 Kas. 462 ; Shaw v. Kirkwood, 24 Kas. 476 ; Pritchard v. Madren, 24 Kas. 486 ; Shoup v. C. B. U. P. Rld. Co., 24 Kas. 547 ; Cartwright v. McFadden, 24 Kas. 662 ; Herzog v. Gregg, 23 Kas. 726 ; Challiss v. Hekelnkaemper, 14 Kas. 474 ; Challiss v. Comm’rs of Atchison Co., 15 Kas. 49 ; Comm’rs of Jefferson Co. v. Johnson, 23 Kas. 718 .)

We think the judgment of the court below was eminently just, proper, legal, and equitable; and it will be affirmed, upon the authorities above cited.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1882–1883: 11912–1913: 118822026peak 1882 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Davidson v. Timmons129 P. 133 (Kan. 1913)
  2. Russell v. Hudson28 Kan. 99 (1882)

Most recent

  1. Davidson v. Timmons129 P. 133 (Kan. 1913)
  2. Russell v. Hudson28 Kan. 99 (1882)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 11

DepthCaseCited by
Corbin v. Young, 24 Kan. 198 (1880) 29
Cartwright v. McFadden, 24 Kan. 662 (1881) 17
Pritchard v. Madren, 24 Kan. 486 (1880) 16
Challiss v. Bd. of Comm'rs, 15 Kan. 49 (1875) 14
Knox v. Dunn, 22 Kan. 683 (1879) 14
Shoup v. Cent. Branch Union Pac. R.R., 24 Kan. 547 (1880) 12
Fairbanks v. Williams, 24 Kan. 16 (1880) 10
Challiss v. Hekelnkæmper, 14 Kan. 474 (1875) 8
Herzog v. Gregg, 23 Kan. 726 (1880) 7
Shaw v. Kirkwood, 24 Kan. 476 (1880) 6
Millbank v. Ostertag, 24 Kan. 462 (1880) 4

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list