Morse v. Brunswick & Co.
J. H. Morse v. Brunswick & Co.
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Quriam:
The only errors discussed in this case in the brief of plaintiffs in error are those alleged to have occurred upon the trial. No motion for a new trial is contained in the record, and therefore the judgment of the district court must be affirmed. (Ferguson v. Graves, 12 Kas. 39; Nesbit v. Hines, 17 id. 316; Hover v. Cockins, 17 id. 518; Typer v. Sooy, 19 id. 598.)
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.