Lebold v. Ottawa County Bank
C. H. Lebold v. The Ottawa County Bank
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
The opinion of the court was delivered by Allen, J.:
The only errors claimed by plaintiffs in error which they seek to have this court consider are based on the testimony introduced on the trial of the action. A case-made is attached to the petition in error, which contains no statement to the effect that it includes all the evidence, though the certificate of the trial judge who settled the case contains such a statement. Within the oft-repeated decisions of this court, this is insufficient to present the questions sought to be raised in this court. (The State, ex rel., v. Comm’rs of Harper Co., 43 *382 Kas. 195 ; Hill v. National Bank, 42 id. 364; Insurance Co. v. Hogue, 41 id. 524; Weaver v. Eddy, 37 id 540.)
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concurring.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.