Levis-Zukoski Mercantile Co. v. Exchange National Bank
The Levis-Zukoski Mercantile Company v. The Exchange National Bank of El Dorado, as Garnishee
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
The opinion of the court was delivered by Smith, J.:
The plaintiffs in error sought to charge a bank, as garnishee, by action against it under the provisions of sections 4644 of the General Statutes of 1901, before it had obtained a judgment against the *551 principal debtor. The section referred to contains the following:
“No trial shall be had of the garnishee action until the plaintiff shall have judgment in the principal action, and if the defendant have judgment, the garnishee action shall be dismissed with costs.”
After plaintiff in error had introduced its evidence in the proceeding against the garnishee, the court sustained a demurer thereto filed by the bank. There was no error in this. It devolves upon a party seeking to recover a judgment against a garnishee to show that his demand against his debtor has passed into judgment and is no longer open to dispute; otherwise, after a protracted trial to ascertain the liability of the garnishee, the plaintiff might fail in his action against the principal debtor, thus wasting the time of the court in an immaterial inquiry. The statute is plain upon the subject and its requirements are based upon sound reason. (Laidlaw v. Morrow, 44 Mich. 547 , 7 N. W. 191 ; Sun Mutual Ins. Co. v. Seeligson & Co., 59 Tex. 3 ; Washburn v. N. Y. & Vt. M. Co. and Trustee, 41 Vt. 50 ; Lowry et al. v. Clements, 9 Ala. 422 .) In the first case cited the decision is based upon a statute. In the others a general principle of law is declared.
The judgment of the court below will be affirmed.
Johnston, Gkeene, Ellis, JJ., concurring.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.