TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State v. Cohen

The State of Kansas v. Isaac Cohen

State v. Cohen, 70 P. 600 (Kan. 1902)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Kansas · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 8, 1902
Docket
No. 13,031
Citations
70 P. 60065 Kan. 8491902 Kan. LEXIS 150
Disposition
Affirmed.
Headnotes
Intoxicating Liquors — Salesman for a Wholesale Liquor House. It transpired in the course'of business conducted by a traveling salesman for a wholesale liquor house located-in Missouri that persons ordering would fail to pay the purchase-price and receive the goods ordered, in which event the liquors would remain stored at the depot where received until another order, corresponding in amount and character of goods shipped, could be obtained by the salesman, when he would procure another bill of lading from the house and the liquors so stored would be turned over to such person, upon payment of the purchase-price. Held, that the transaction was in violation of law.
Summary
Appeal from Ellis district court; Lee Monroe, judge.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam;

Defendant, an employe of a wholesale liquor house, located at St. Joseph, Mo., was engaged in soliciting orders for intoxicating liquors in this state. When such orders were received by defendant they would be forwarded to the house at St. Joseph. If approved by the house, the liquors would be shipped to the person ordering. It transpired, in the course of business so conducted, that persons ordering would fail to pay the purchase-price and receive the goods ordered, in which event the liquors would remain stored at the depot where received until another order, corresponding in amount and character of goods shipped, could be obtained by defendant, when he would procure another bill of lading from his house and the liquor so stored would be turned over to such person upon payment of the purchase-price, together with the charges thereon. One of such transactions was had with the prosecuting witness in this case, John Younger, for which defendant was prosecuted, convicted, and appeals.

Whatever may be the right of the defendant under lhe law as a traveling salesman engaged in soliciting orders for his house^located in a foreign state, where such orders are received, accepted and filled in such *851 state, and the liquors ordered are delivered to a common carrier for transportation into, and delivery to, the purchaser in this state, the transaction here shown cannot be justified in law. It constituted an unlawful sale and violation of the law.

There being no error apparent in the record, the judgment of conviction is confirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list