TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Covey v. Charles

Loney M. Covey v. Althea V. Charles, by James A. Charles her husband and next friend

Covey v. Charles, 49 Md. 314 (1878)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Maryland · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 27, 1878
Judges
Robinson
Citations
49 Md. 3141878 Md. LEXIS 48
Headnotes
Order of Orphans’ Court from which an Appeal will not lie— Art. 93, sec. 15, of the Code. ■ The power to grant letters of administration to two or more persons with the consent of the person first entitled, conferred on the Orphans’ Courts by sec. 15 of Art. 93 of the Code, is one to be exercised entirely in the discretion of the Court, and from its exercise no appeal will lie.
Summary
Appeal from the Orphans’ Court of Caroline County.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Robinson

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Robinson, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The Orphans’ Court of Caroline County having decided that the appellant was entitled to letters of administration on the estate of Martha B. Covey, she subsequently filed a petition praying that Edward R. Gaslin he associated with her in said administration, and this appeal is taken from the order of the Court dismissing said petition.

See. 15 of Art. 93 of the Code provides that administration may he granted to two or more persons, with the consent of the person first entitled.

The power to grant letters of administration to two or more persons, thus conferred on the Orphans’ Court, is one to he exercised entirely in the discretion of the Court, and from its exercise no appeal lies to this Court.

The grounds upon which the Court acted are not the subject of review, and the appeal must therefore be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1900: 11926: 119002026peak 1900 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Mobley v. Mobley131 A. 770 (Md. 1926)
  2. Kailer v. Kailer48 A. 712 (Md. 1900)

Most recent

  1. Mobley v. Mobley131 A. 770 (Md. 1926)
  2. Kailer v. Kailer48 A. 712 (Md. 1900)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list