Andreae v. Sonderegger
Charles Andreae v. Otto Sonderegger
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam:
The plaintiff in error struck the defendant in error on the head with a piece of iron pipe, inflicting injuries for which the latter recovered damages in the sum of $2070.80. Many exceptions were taken to rulings on the admission of testimony, but upon examining them in detail we find no material error; nor do they justify extended comment. The charge of the court was full and. fair, *861 and there was no error in the instructions given, nor in the refusal of instructions requested. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and it cannot be said that the damages awarded were so excessive as to indicate passion and prejudice.
The judgment is affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.