St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Haskin
The St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. Ed. L. Haskin
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Ouriam:
This is a proceeding in error brought to review a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiffs in an action on a fire-insurance policy. No questions are presented except such as relate to the admission of evidence at the trial. Complaint is made that, under the guise of showing that proofs of loss had been properly made, plaintiffs were permitted to introduce incompetent evidence of the value of the goods destroyed. As the court instructed the jury not to consider this evidence in estimating the value of the property, there is nothing substantial in the claim. Further complaint is made of the admission of the prices shown by a certain invoice, but these were also withdrawn from the jury by instructions. Other assignments relating to evidence admitted are not made with sufficient definiteness to require consideration. (Garden City v. Heller, 61 Kan. 767 , 60 Pac. 1060 .) Error is also alleged in the giving of instructions, but the record fails to show that any exceptions to them were taken.
The judgment is affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.