State v. Ryan
The State of Kansas v. Ed Ryan
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam:
In this case the defendant was convicted of the crime of grand larceny, and sentenced to the penitentiary of the state of Kansas for a period of one year. Several errors are assigned, but only one is presented for our consideration by the briefs, to wit, that the evidence is not sufficient to sustain a judgment of conviction. The evidence is conflicting, and, while a verdict and judgment of not guilty might well have been rendered upon it, yet, viewed in its most favorable light to the state, as we are obliged to view it after it has been passed on by the jury and their conclusion approved by the trial court, there is sufficient evidence upon every material question involved to sustain the verdict and sentence.
The judgment of the district court is therefore affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.