TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Gibson v. Wood

Charles E. Gibson v. Ben Wood

Gibson v. Wood, 106 P. 1005 (Kan. 1910)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Kansas · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 12, 1910
Docket
No. 16,338
Citations
106 P. 100581 Kan. 8911910 Kan. LEXIS 447
Disposition
Affirmed.
Syllabus
Tax Deeds — Time of Issuance — Presumption. A tax deed more than five years old held good upon its face although it showed that it was executed more than four years after the sale on which it was based.
Summary
Appeal from Stanton district court; William H. Thompson, judge.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam:

The only question involved in this case,, it is conceded, is the validity of a tax deed under which the appellees claim title to the land in question, and which had been of record more than five years before-the commencement of the action.

The appellant claims that the deed is void, in that it. was issued more than one year after the assignment of the tax certificate by the county clerk, such assignment, having been made more than three years after the sale of the land for taxes. The appellees, on the other hand, contend that the tax deed, since it has been of record more than five years, although it does not show that a. prior tax deed had been issued under the tax-sale assignment, is valid.

In Gibson v. Young, ante, p. 185, it was held, as to infirmities alleged to exist in the proceedings which might, invalidate a tax deed, as follows:

“It has frequently been decided that where a tax deed' is valid upon its face, and has been of record and parties, have been in possession under it more than five years, no infirmity which does not appear upon its face can be-litigated.” (Page 186.)

The decision in this case is in full accord with, and is. warranted by, that case, and the judgment is affirmed..

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list