TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Brown v. Wilkerson

Frank J. Brown v. J. M. Wilkerson

Brown v. Wilkerson, 108 P. 816 (Kan. 1910)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Kansas · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 7, 1910
Docket
No. 17,095
Citations
108 P. 81682 Kan. 5531910 Kan. LEXIS 303
Disposition
Appellant’s application denied.
Syllabus
Temporary Injunction — Dissolution on Final Hearing — Continuance in Force by Appeal. Where a party who obtained a temporary injunction was defeated on the final hearing, the injunction was not continued in force by his appeal.
Summary
Appeal from Shawnee district court; Alston W. Dana, judge.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam:

The plaintiff in an injunction suit obtained a temporary injunction and gave a bond. On a final hearing judgment was rendered for the defendant, the preliminary order being set aside. The plaintiff appealed within a time fixed by the court, not exceeding ten days, and claims that by virtue of this appeal his temporary injunction and the bond supporting it remain in force. The statute provides:

“When an order discharging ... an attachment or temporary injunction shall be made in any case, and the party who obtained such . . . injunction shall appeal from such order to the supreme court, the court or judge granting such order shall, upon application of the appellant, fix the time, not exceeding ten days from the discharge or modification of such attachment or injunction, within which the appeal shall be perfected, and during such time the execution of said order shall be suspended and until the decision of the case upon appeal, if the appeal be taken; and the undertaking given upon the allowance of the attachment shall be and remain in full force until the discharge shall take effect. If the appeal be not taken within the time limited, the order of discharge shall become operative and be carried into effect.” (Code 1909, § 595.)

Here the temporary injunction was not vacated until *554 the hearing on the merits; but assuming that the order of vacation may be treated as a separate ruling preceding the judgment, and that the plaintiff by his appeal has stayed the operation of that ruling, the final judgment itself supersedes the prior proceedings, and until it is stayed by some court or order no injunction is in force.

The appellant’s application is denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1928: 119282026peak 1928 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Citizens State Bank v. Clark266 P. 932 (Kan. 1928)

Most recent

  1. Citizens State Bank v. Clark266 P. 932 (Kan. 1928)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list