State v. Scott
The State of Kansas v. C. C. Scott
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam:
There were two defendants and the verdict was guilty as to both. The court set aside the verdict as to one of the defendants and the errors which could only have affected him need not be considered. There is nothing substantial in either of the contentions of the appellant. The appellant made no request for any instructions and the instructions given correctly stated the law. Two witnesses swore that the appellant sold them whisky at different times and that they paid him for it. The jury who heard the testimony and saw the witnesses believed them. The trial court, with the same opportunity of passing upon their credibility, approved the verdict. No reason is suggested why we should disbelieve the witnesses.
The judgment is affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.