TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Garden City, Gulf & Northern Railroad v. Nation

The Garden City, Gulf & Northern Railroad Company v. James M. Nation, as Auditor, etc.

Garden City, Gulf & Northern R.R. v. Nation, 109 P. 772 (Kan. 1910)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Kansas · State Highest Courts
Decided
July 9, 1910
Docket
No. 16,988
Citations
109 P. 77283 Kan. 2371910 Kan. LEXIS 509
Disposition
Motion denied.
Syllabus
Public Officers — Individual Liability for Performance of Duties. The rule applied that executive officers are not. individually liable for the performance of duties involving discretion and judgment, in the absence of malice, oppression in office or willful misconduct.
Summary
Original proceeding in mandamus.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam:

The motion of the plaintiff for an order from this court allowing the plaintiff for expenses in attending court, printing briefs and attorney’s fees is denied, for the amount claimed or for any amount whatever. Thé duty of the state auditor in passing upon questions presented in the original case, as to whether the municipal bonds in question should be registered in his office, involves the decision of a judicial question. His action in deciding the same is quasi judicial. The performance of his duty involves the exercise of judgment, and in the absence of any suggestion of malice, oppression in office or willful misconduct, he is not individually responsible. (29 Cyc. 1444; 23 A. & E. Encycl. of L. 375.) Indeed, the request for an order against him. is in his capacity as state auditor, and is in effect a proceeding against the state. The state can not in a proceeding of this nature be subjected to a money judgment, especially in the absence of *238 any consent on the part of the state, or of the officer authorized to give such consent, to be made a party to such proceeding. The costs of this motion will be taxed to the plaintiff.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1917: 11919: 11930: 11937: 21968: 11982: 219172026peak 1937 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. BD. OF COUNTY COM'RS, ETC. v. Cirac639 P.2d 538 (Nev. 1982)
  2. Barten v. Turkey Creek Watershed Joint District No. 32438 P.2d 732 (Kan. 1968)
  3. State ex rel. State Road Commission v. District Court, Fourth Judicial Dist.78 P.2d 502 (Utah 1937) · Dissent
  4. Gresty v. Darby68 P.2d 649 (Kan. 1937)
  5. Heman Construction Co. v. Capper182 P. 386 (Kan. 1919)
  6. Board of County Commissioners v. Cirac639 P.2d 538 (Nev. 1982)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list