Johnston v. Lanter
O. H. Johnston v. Frank R. Lanter
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam:
The judgment of the district court sustaining the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial is affirmed on the authority of the case of Bourquin v. Railway Co., 88 Kan. 183 , 127 Pac. 770 , which states the practice in this state as settled by a long line of decisions.
By denying the plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the special findings and granting his motion for a new trial the court indicated dissatisfaction with the findings as well as with the general verdict, and judgment on the special findings will not be directed in favor of the plaintiff.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 24 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.