City of Junction City v. Central National Bank
The City of Junction City, and v. The Central National Bank of Junction City, and
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam:
A petition for a rehearing was filed in this case and time was given to file a more extended supplemental petition, both of which have now been considered. In these it is shown that the lawyers for the bank acted in good faith in raising debatable questions as to the validity of the bonds. We gladly chronicle that fact. This showing was made by depositions taken for use in the trial below; but, since the district court struck out that defense, the depositions were not offered in evidence.
Aside from recognizing the good faith of the bank’s attorneys, however, we do not wish to modify our opinion of the law as stated in the original decision, nor do we find in the petition for a rehearing any occasion to amplify what was there decided.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.