TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Maryland Realty Corp. v. Mitchell

THE MARYLAND REALTY CORPORATION, Incorporated v. JOSEPH B. MITCHELL

Md. Realty Corp. v. Mitchell, 98 A. 1083 (Md. 1916)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Maryland · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 7, 1916
Judges
Stockbridge
Citations
98 A. 1083128 Md. 6981916 Md. LEXIS 115
Syllabus
Wills: constructionj devises over, should any legatee not he in esse. A testator by bis will devised two-thirds of his property to his three children, share and share alike;- and then provided that if any of them “should die without having married or leaving children, his or her share to be divided among the surviving children, the heirs, however, of any of the three children who might have died previously to be entitled to their parents’ share”: Held, that: This latter provision was not in derogation of the absolute estate that had been already devised, but was simply a devise over in case any of the legatees should not be in esse to take when the will became operative.
Summary
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City. (Hetjislbr, J.)

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Stockbridge

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Stockbridge, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court of Appeals aifirming the decree of the lower Court.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1917: 11946: 119172026peak 1917 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Pyne v. Pyne154 F.2d 297 (D.C. Cir. 1946)
  2. Clagett v. Bowie100 A. 635 (Md. 1917)

Most recent

  1. Pyne v. Pyne154 F.2d 297 (D.C. Cir. 1946)
  2. Clagett v. Bowie100 A. 635 (Md. 1917)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list