Hesser v. Bale
P. E. Hesser v. Aus Bale
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam:
On August 1, 1921, P. E. Hesser orally leased a farm to Aus Bale. A dispute arose between them as to whether the lease was for one year, as the landlord asserted, or for two, as the tenant claimed. At the end of the first year the former brought a proceeding under the forcible entry and detainer statute in which he recovered judgment for restitution of the premises and for costs, from which this appeal is taken. Assuming that the defendant’s version of the contract is correct, his right of possession under the lease has now expired. The controversy having become moot, the appeal is dismissed. (Geinger v. Krein, 103 Kan. 176 , 173 Pac. 298 .)
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.