Goebel v. Davis
Clarence F. Goebel v. Jonathan M. Davis, Governor Frank J. Ryan, Secretary of State Norton A. Turner, Auditor R. Neill Rahn, Adjutant General Ben S. Paulen, Lieutenant Governor Carl R. White, Director of Compensation
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
The opinion of the court was delivered by Hopkins, J.:
The action was one for adjusted compensation. The defendants prevailed and plaintiff appeals.
The plaintiff is a resident of Kansas 'City, Kansas. He enlisted in the United States navy April 20, 1917, and was honorably discharged June 11, 1920. Under an application for compensation under the adjusted compensation act, he was awarded compensation from the time of his enlistment to June 30, 1919, amounting to $802. *227 His claim for compensation for services from June 30, 1919, to June 11, 1920, was denied by the board of administration of adjusted compensation and by the district court of Wyandotte county, and he brings the case here.
The judgment of the district court is affirmed on the authority of the decision in the case of Dew v. Davis et al., ante, p. 219.
Harvey, J. dissenting.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.