Carter v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
We have repeatedly held that each of the contentions raised by the appellant is not available as a basis for the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus: (1) that he was refused the right to a separate trial, Shields v. Warden, 212 Md. 655, 656 ; (2) that the charge of arson was not proven at his trial, Johnson v. Warden, 212 Md. 652, 653 ; (3) that postponement of his trial was refused, Lawrenson v. Warden, 212 Md. 664, 666 ; and (4) that the court refused to allow character witnesses to testify, Davis v. Warden, 208 Md. 675 .
Application denied, with costs.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.