TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Polaski v. Director of Patuxent Institution

Polaski v. Dir. of Patuxent Inst., 184 A.2d 623 (Md. 1962)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Maryland · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 11, 1962
Docket
No. App. No. 28
Citations
184 A.2d 623229 Md. 6451962 Md. LEXIS 624229 Md. 6421962 Md. LEXIS 621

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

Application for leave to appeal from an order recommitting petitioner to Patuxent Institution, after a finding that he was still a defective delinquent, must be denied for the reason that the petitioner filed no specification of errors as required by Maryland Rule 894. Perkerson v. Director, 226 Md. 666 , 174 A. 2d 436 .

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1963: 11965: 119632026peak 1963 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Murel v. Director of the Patuxent Institution191 A.2d 445 (Md. 1963)
  2. McDonough v. Director of Patuxent Institution207 A.2d 95 (Md. 1965)

Most recent

  1. McDonough v. Director of Patuxent Institution207 A.2d 95 (Md. 1965)
  2. Murel v. Director of the Patuxent Institution191 A.2d 445 (Md. 1963)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Perkerson v. Dir., 174 A.2d 436 (Md. 1961) 2

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list