TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Board of County Commissioners v. Conner

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF CHARLES COUNTY v. CONNER t/a SOUTHERN TRAILS RENO

Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs v. Conner, 248 A.2d 486 (Md. 1968)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Maryland · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 6, 1968
Docket
No. 244
Judges
Hammond
Citations
248 A.2d 486251 Md. 6701968 Md. LEXIS 479

Opinion of the Court — Hammond

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Hammond, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case was advanced and argued immediately after the case of Clerk v. Chesapeake Beach Park, Inc., 251 Md. 657 in which we reversed the holding of the Circuit Court for Calvert County that console and pinball machines that pay off in merchandise are not slot machines within the definition of Ch. 617 of the Laws of 1963 and could legally be licensed and operated in Calvert County. In the case now before us the Circuit Court for Charles County reached the same conclusion, as had the Circuit Court for Calvert County, holding that one-arm bandits were proscribed statewide by Ch. 617 as slot machines, even though they paid off in tokens redeemable for merchandise but that console and pinball machines that paid off in merchandise were not within the definition in Ch. 617 of slot machines and therefore could legally be licensed and operated under the local law of Charles County.

Eor the reasons given in the opinion in the Calvert County case, we hold that Judge Digges erred in finding the console and pinball machines to be without the definition of a slot machine in Ch. 617 and his orders implementing his findings in this respect must be reversed.

Order of the Circuit Court for Charles County granting the writ of mandamus for the licensing of console and pinball machines reversed, and its order denying the writ for one-arm bandits affirmed, and case remanded for the making of a declaration in accordance with the opinion herein, all costs-to be paid by the appellee.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1985: 119852026peak 1985 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State v. One Hundred & Fifty-Eight Gaming Devices499 A.2d 940 (Md. 1985)

Most recent

  1. State v. One Hundred & Fifty-Eight Gaming Devices499 A.2d 940 (Md. 1985)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Clerk of Circuit Court v. Chesapeake Beach Park, Inc., 248 A.2d 479 (Md. 1969) 18

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list