United States v. Patricia Ann Larson

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patricia Ann LARSON, Defendant-Appellant

United States v. Larson, 471 F.3d 1359 (9th Cir. 2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided: December 29, 2006
Docket: No. 05-30076
Judges: Schroeder
Citations: 471 F.3d 13592006 U.S. App. LEXIS 32043

Opinion

ORDER Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this ease be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 2 cases

View all citing references →

U.S. Courts of Appeals2

Relies on it most ⓘ

United States v. Marguet-Pillado560 F.3d 1078 (9th Cir. 2009)
Robert Charles Comer v. Terry L. Stewart, Director Dora B. Schriro, Director, of Arizona Department of Corrections471 F.3d 1359 (9th Cir. 2006)

Most recent

United States v. Marguet-Pillado560 F.3d 1078 (9th Cir. 2009)
Robert Charles Comer v. Terry L. Stewart, Director Dora B. Schriro, Director, of Arizona Department of Corrections471 F.3d 1359 (9th Cir. 2006)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

Depth	Case	Cited by
	Comer v. Stewart, 471 F.3d 1359 (9th Cir. 2006)	4

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list