TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

School District No. 14 v. Board of County Commissioners

School District No. 14, in Shawnee County v. The Board of County Commissioners of the County of Shawnee

Sch. Dist. No. 14 v. Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs, 110 P.2d 744 (Kan. 1941)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Kansas · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 27, 1941
Docket
No. 35,171
Citations
110 P.2d 744153 Kan. 2811941 Kan. LEXIS 128

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam:

From the record now on file and after argument of counsel it is clear that the action sought to be maintained herein by the plaintiff-appellant is essentially one to challenge the validity of the organization of School District No. 97 of Shawnee county, and to question its boundaries, which is the sort of lawsuit which this plaintiff has no right to maintain under many precedents of this court. See School District No. 38 v. Rural High School District, 116 Kan. 40, 42 , 225 Pac. 732 , and citations; Euler v. Rossville Drainage District, 118 Kan. 363 , 235 Pac. 95 ; Scamahorn v. Perry, 132 Kan. 679 , 296 Pac. 347 ; Shaffer v. Ford County Comm’rs, 133 Kan. 256 , 299 Pac. 613 ; Fortune v. Hooven, 133 Kan. 638 , 2 P. 2d 142 .

This appeal is therefore dismissed and the clerk of this court' is directed to issue the mandate herein forthwith.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1942: 11947: 11949: 11966: 21970: 119422026peak 1966 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Smith v. City of Emporia211 P.2d 101 (Kan. 1949)
  2. Babcock v. City of Kansas City419 P.2d 882 (Kan. 1966)
  3. Dunn v. Board of County Commissioners177 P.2d 207 (Kan. 1947)
  4. Unified School District No. 335 v. State Board of Education478 P.2d 201 (Kan. 1970)
  5. Bradford v. Board of County Commissioners131 P.2d 663 (Kan. 1942)
  6. Schulenberg v. City of Reading410 P.2d 324 (Kan. 1966)

Most recent

  1. Unified School District No. 335 v. State Board of Education478 P.2d 201 (Kan. 1970)
  2. Babcock v. City of Kansas City419 P.2d 882 (Kan. 1966)
  3. Schulenberg v. City of Reading410 P.2d 324 (Kan. 1966)
  4. Smith v. City of Emporia211 P.2d 101 (Kan. 1949)
  5. Dunn v. Board of County Commissioners177 P.2d 207 (Kan. 1947)
  6. Bradford v. Board of County Commissioners131 P.2d 663 (Kan. 1942)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 5

DepthCaseCited by
Sch. Dist. No. 38 v. Rural High Sch. Dist. No. 6, 225 P. 732 (Kan. 1924) 10
Euler v. Rossville Drainage Dist., 235 P. 95 (Kan. 1925) 9
Scamahorn v. Perry, 296 P. 347 (Kan. 1931) 8
Shaffer v. Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs, 299 P. 613 (Kan. 1931) 4
Fortune v. Hooven, 2 P.2d 142 (Kan. 1931) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list