State v. Mansaw
State of Kansas v. Dana Mansaw
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
The opinion of the court was delivered by Allegrucci, J.:
Dana J. Mansaw appeals his conviction in Wyandotte County of possession of cocaine, K.S.A. 65-4160(a). A unanimous panel of the Court of Appeals affirmed. State v. Mansaw, 32 Kan. App. 2d 1011 , 93 P.3d 737 (2004). We granted Man-saw’s petition for review.
Mansaw contends the trial court erred (1) in denying his motion to suppress evidence found during the search incident to his arrest; (2) in finding sufficient evidence to sustain his conviction; and (3) in concluding Mansaw’s statutory right to a speedy trial had not been violated.
We have carefully reviewed the entire record and conclude the Court of Appeals’ opinion adequately addressed the issues and reached the correct conclusion on each of the three issues. We, therefore, adopt the opinion of the Court of Appeals and affirm both the Court of Appeals and the district court. See Supreme Court Rule 7.042(c) and (f) (2004 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 51).
*310 Gernon, J., not participating. Larson, S.J., assigned.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.