TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

People ex rel. Comstock v. Judge of the Wayne Circuit Court

The People on the relation of Alexander G. Comstock v. The Judge of the Wayne Circuit Court

People ex rel. Comstock v. Judge of the Wayne Circuit Court, 30 Mich. 98 (1874)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Michigan Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
July 21, 1874
Citations
30 Mich. 981874 Mich. LEXIS 141
Headnotes
Justice's courts: Dismissal of suit: Judgment: Appeal: Non-suit. The decision of a justice dismissing a suit on motion for want of jurisdiction for an alleged defect in the summons is held to he equivalent in effect to a judgment of non-suit, and is appealable. Semedy: Mandamus: Writ of error:' Dismissal of appeal. Mandamus is the proper remedy to correct an order of the circuit dismissing such an appeal on the ground that such decision of the justice was not a judgment, and therefore not appealable; a return to a writ of error would not regularly disclose the whole proceedings on the motion to dismiss, or the grounds of the dismissal.
Summary
Application for mandamus. The relator commenced a suit before a justice of the peace, against one Francis W. Fifield, by short summons, and it was not stated in the summons that either 'party was a non-resident of the county. On the return day the justice, on the defendant’s motion, dismissed the suit for want of jurisdiction for this alleged defect in the summons. The relator appealed to the circuit, and the circuit judge, ón a special motion by counsel for defendant and appellee, dismissed the appeal on the ground that the decision of the justice was not a judgment, and therefore was not appeal-able. Mandamus is now applied for, to require the circuit judge to set aside the order dismissing the appeal.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

The Court

held that the decision of the justice was equivalent in effect to a judgment of non-suit, and that an appeal would lie; and that mandamus,- and not a writ of error, was the proper remedy, because the return to a writ of error would not disclose the whole proceedings on the special motion made by the appellee, and without them the grounds of the dismissal, under the order entered in the cause, could not be made sufficiently to appear.

Writ granted, with costs against Fifield.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1877–1878: 11879–1880: 11899–1900: 11961–1962: 118772026peak 1877 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Stall v. Diamond37 Mich. 429 (1877)
  2. American Eutectic Welding Alloys Sales Co. v. Grier108 N.W.2d 831 (Mich. 1961)
  3. Schulte v. Kelly83 N.W. 405 (Mich. 1900)
  4. Cheever v. Circuit Judge7 N.W. 186 (Mich. 1880)

Most recent

  1. American Eutectic Welding Alloys Sales Co. v. Grier108 N.W.2d 831 (Mich. 1961)
  2. Schulte v. Kelly83 N.W. 405 (Mich. 1900)
  3. Cheever v. Circuit Judge7 N.W. 186 (Mich. 1880)
  4. Stall v. Diamond37 Mich. 429 (1877)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list