TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

People ex rel. Taylor v. Judge of the St. Clair Circuit

The People on the relation of John R. Taylor v. The Judge of the St. Clair Circuit

People ex rel. Taylor v. Judge of the St. Clair Circuit, 32 Mich. 95 (1875)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Michigan Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 30, 1875
Judges
Oueiam
Citations
32 Mich. 951875 Mich. LEXIS 137
Headnotes
Circuit courts: JSwpei'visory jurisdiction: Inferior tribmials: Certiorari: Proceedings before commissioner to dissolve attachment Circuit courts have, under the constitution (Art. VI, § S), a general supervisory control, subject to the appellate jurisdiction of the supreme court, over inferior courts and. tribunals; and they may issue a common-law certiorari to bring up for review proceedings before a circuit court c.ommissioner for the dissolution of an attachment.
Summary
Application for Mandamus. Eelator commenced suit by attachment against one Marcus Young in the St. Clair circuit. Young, after having moved the court to quash the proceedings for insufficiency of the affidavit and failed in his motion, applied to the circuit court commissioner of the county to dissolve the attachment, and the commissioner dissolved it for insufficiency of the affidavit in form. The relator thereupon applied to the circuit judge for a certiorari to review the proceedings before the commissioner, which writ was granted. When the cause came on for hearing, however, the circuit judge declined to hear it on the ground of want of jurisdiction. The relator applies for mandamus to require the respondent to reinstate the cause and hear and determine it on its merits, and makes a showing of the above facts, and also that the commissioner’s term had since expired, and that he was not reelected, and that for that reason, as the relator is advised, he is prevented from suing out a new writ of certiorari.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Oueiam

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Pee OueiaM:

This case is ruled by Thompson v. School District No. 6 of Crockery, 25 Mich., 483 .

The writ must issue.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1879–1880: 11903–1904: 11907–1908: 118792026peak 1879 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Baker v. Newton1908 OK 232, 98 P. 931
  2. Steel v. Clinton Circuit Judge95 N.W. 993 (Mich. 1903)
  3. Merrick v. Township Board2 N.W. 922 (Mich. 1879)

Most recent

  1. Baker v. Newton1908 OK 232, 98 P. 931
  2. Steel v. Clinton Circuit Judge95 N.W. 993 (Mich. 1903)
  3. Merrick v. Township Board2 N.W. 922 (Mich. 1879)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Thompson v. Sch. Dist. No. Six, 25 Mich. 483 (1872) 9

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list