TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Sprague v. Soule

Hobart Sprague v. James B. Soule and others

Sprague v. Soule, 35 Mich. 35 (1876)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Michigan Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 13, 1876
Judges
Marston, Other
Citations
35 Mich. 351876 Mich. LEXIS 227
Headnotes
Bill of interpleader: Express agreement with some of the defendants. A bill of interpleader is a bill filed for the protection of a person from whom several persons claim legally or equitably the same thing, debt or duty, but who has incurred no independent liability to any of them, and does not himself claim an interest in the matter; and it will not lie where complainant has incurred an independent liability under an express agreement with some of the defendants.1
Summary
Appeal in Chancery from Ottawa Circuit.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Marston

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Marston, J.:

A bill of interpleader is a bill filed for the protection of a person from whom several persons claim legally or equitably the same thing, debt, or duty; but who has incurred no independent liability to any of them, and does not himself claim an interest in the matter. — Adams’ Eq., 202. And it is essential, among other things that the party seeking relief has incurred no independent liability to either claimant.— Id., 204. In this case the bill alleges that *complainant incurred the liability under an express agreement with some of the parties against whom he now claims relief. *35 Such being the ease he is not entitled to the relief he now seeks.

The decree dismissing the hill must he affirmed, with costs.

The other justices concurred.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1881–1882: 11909–1910: 11911–1912: 21931–1932: 11945–1946: 118812026peak 1911 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Chas. H. Steffey, Inc. v. American Bank Stationery Co.155 A. 306 (Md. 1931)
  2. Detroit Trust Co. v. Hunrath131 N.W. 147 (Mich. 1911)
  3. Love v. Hartford Life Insurance132 S.W. 335 (Mo. Ct. App. 1910)
  4. Michigan Trust Co. v. McNamara130 N.W. 653 (Mich. 1911)
  5. Gairing v. McClelland18 N.W.2d 838 (Mich. 1945)
  6. Moore v. Barnheisel8 N.W. 531 (Mich. 1881)

Most recent

  1. Gairing v. McClelland18 N.W.2d 838 (Mich. 1945)
  2. Chas. H. Steffey, Inc. v. American Bank Stationery Co.155 A. 306 (Md. 1931)
  3. Detroit Trust Co. v. Hunrath131 N.W. 147 (Mich. 1911)
  4. Michigan Trust Co. v. McNamara130 N.W. 653 (Mich. 1911)
  5. Love v. Hartford Life Insurance132 S.W. 335 (Mo. Ct. App. 1910)
  6. Moore v. Barnheisel8 N.W. 531 (Mich. 1881)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list