Peppler v. Ratz
George Peppler v. George Ratz
Peppler v. Ratz, 38 Mich. 96 (1878)
Headnotes
Variance.
A declaration charging a defendant with receiving lumber as plaintiffs agent to sell, and with collecting and not paying over the proceeds, cannot be supported by proof of a sale of the lumber to defendant, and the partial non-payment of the price by him as original purchaser. — Per Curiam.
Summary
Error to Osceola.
The court below found that the plaintiff could not recover under his declaration, and the plaintiff brought error.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Affirmed with costs.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.