Van Baalen v. People
Isaac Van Baalen v. The People
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Graves, J.
Van Baalen was fined in the Recorder’s court in the city of Detroit for having carried on the business of a pawnbroker without license, contrary to a city ordinance, and he has brought the case here by certiorari.
The ground taken is that the ordinance, which among other regulations not complained of, exacts a fee of $200, is unreasonable in consequence of the magnitude of the charge, and is therefore invalid.
The recorder found the facts, and among others, that the business of pawnbroking gives rise to a heavy city expense, and especially in the increase of police duty and supervision which it necessitates, and he ascertained *259 and found in terms that the sum charged • does not greatly exceed the incidental and consequential expense, and it appears plainly enough from his explanations and from matters subject to judicial notice that it is quite impossible to say the city can derive a particle of profit from the rate objected to.
Of course the subject will not admit of nice calculation, and it would be futile to require anything of the kind. Where the power to license is not evidently abused and made a pretext for doing what is a violation of constitutional right, the courts ought not to interfere with municipal discretion.
The case is governed by former decisions. Ash v. The People, 11 Mich., 347 ; Kitson v. The Mayor, 26 Mich., 325 .
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
The other Justices concurred.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 16 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.