TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

People ex rel. Campau v. Judge of Superior Court

People ex rel. Daniel J. Campau v. Judge of Superior Court People ex rel. Catharine Burns v. Judge of Superior Court

People ex rel. Campau v. Judge of Superior Court, 40 Mich. 630 (1879)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Michigan Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 23, 1879
Citations
40 Mich. 630
Headnotes
New trial — Act No. 8 of 1870. The right to a new trial arises whenever a judge dies before a bill of exceptions can be settled. Act No. 8 of 1879 authorizing the bill to be settled from the stenographer’s minutes, did not divest this right, at least if it was asserted before the act was passed.
Summary
Mandamus.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

Mandamus to require the judge of the Superior court to grant new trials in cases in which the relators were concerned, and in which they had lost the benefit of their exceptions by reason of the death of the trial judge before the bill of exceptions could be settled. The respondent relied upon a statute passed in 1879, authorizing the notes of the official stenographer to be used by the successor of the deceased judge in settling the bill of exceptions. It appeared, however, that in both cases the application for a new trial had been made, —and in one ease it had been granted, though leave was afterward revoked, — before the statute was passed, and when the right to a new trial had under former decisions become absolutely vested. Held that without considering the validity of the statute, it did not take away the rights already vested and asserted.

Mandamus granted.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 10 cases

View all citing references →
1880–1881: 11892–1893: 11894–1895: 11896–1897: 11904–1905: 21906–1907: 11908–1909: 11916–1917: 11920–1921: 118802026peak 1904 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Richardson v. State89 P. 1027 (Wyo. 1907)
  2. Henrichsen v. Smith42 P. 486 (Or. 1896)
  3. Alley v. McCabe35 N.E. 615 (Ill. 1893)
  4. State v. Ricks201 P. 827 (Idaho 1921) · Dissent
  5. Dennis v. State137 Tenn. 543 (1917)
  6. Martin v. Bacon88 S.W. 863 (Ark. 1905)

Most recent

  1. State v. Ricks201 P. 827 (Idaho 1921) · Dissent
  2. Dennis v. State137 Tenn. 543 (1917)
  3. Dumbarton Realty Co. v. Erickson120 N.W. 1025 (Iowa 1909)
  4. Richardson v. State89 P. 1027 (Wyo. 1907)
  5. Johnson v. Smith62 A. 9 (Vt. 1905)
  6. Martin v. Bacon88 S.W. 863 (Ark. 1905)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list