People ex rel. King v. Wayne Circuit Judge
People ex rel. John M. King v. Wayne Circuit Judge
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Pee Curiam.
We think the circuit judge was sufficiently liberal in permitting such amendments as he allowed in this case, and that there was no excess of authority or abuse of discretion in the action now complained of. We cannot, therefore, interfere with it. ■
Mandamus denied.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.