TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Township of Comins v. Township of Harrisville

Twp. of Comins v. Twp. of Harrisville, 8 N.W. 44 (Mich. 1881)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Michigan Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 28, 1881
Judges
Campbell, Cooley, Graves, Marston
Citations
8 N.W. 4445 Mich. 4421881 Mich. LEXIS 747
Disposition
Affirmed.
Headnotes
Organization of townships — Collection of taxes. A township is not completely organized for the assessment, levy and collection of taxes until the election of its proper officers; and until then the township from which it is set off may levy and collect the taxes. Assumpsit on the common counts will not lie at the suit of a township to recover from the township from which it has been set off the amount of school and township taxes collected by the latter under an assessment made upon the territory of the former before its township organization was perfected.
Summary
Case made after judgment from Alcona. Assumpsit. Defendant had judgment.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Marston

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Marston, C. J.

The facts as found by the circuit judge appear in the margin. *

The law of this State relating to the assessment, levy and collection of taxes, does not regard certain designated territory as a township until the proper officers necessary to conduct its affairs have been elected. The officers of the new township not having been elected- until July, there was not such a perfected organization as would enable that township to assess the township and school taxes for that year. Under such circumstances, in my opinion the township of Harris-ville had a right to levy and collect the taxes in question. *444 But whether it did or not, the present action will not lie to recover the moneys so collected. If it did have, this is not the proper remedy; if it did not, its action cannot be ratified by the town of Comins, and an action maintained for the money.

In either view the judgment below was correct and must be affirmed with costs.

Cooley and Graves, JJ. concurred. Campbell, J. I concur in the result.

The facts found are as follows: From the year 1869 until the twenty-second day of March, A. D. 1877, the county of Oscoda was attached to the county of Alcona, for judicial and municipal purposes, and up to the last-named date the township of Harrisville lawfully and legally exercised municipal jurisdiction over the territory comprising the said county of Oscoda. \

That on the last-named date the legislature passed an act (No. 263, Sess. Laws 1877), organizing the county of Oscoda into a township, called by said act the township of Oomins, said act taking immediate effect.

In the year 1877 the supervisor of the township of Harrisville made an assessment roll, embracing, with other territory, all the territory in the county of Oscoda. The total amount of taxes spread upon the whole roll was $28,293.24, of which there was assessed for townslHp taxes $809 76; for school taxes $4164.65. Included in the two last-named items was the sum of $469.39 for township tax and $1702.01 for school tax, which two last-named items were assessed upon the territory comprised in the county of Oscoda. Said two last-named items were collected by the treasurer of the township of Harrisville. The interest on said two last-named items to day of trial is $341.95.

The township of Oomins elected officers of the township in the month of July, 1877. This was the first election of township officers in the township of Oomins.

In the year 1879 the township of Oomins, by its duly-constituted agent, made a demand on the township board of the township of Harrisville for the payment to the township of Oomins of both of said items of township and school tax, and interest thereon, stated above to have been collected from the county of Oscoda.

Upon the foregoing facts found it is concluded that if the said tax was legally assessed, then the money arising from the assessment belongs to the defendant; if the assessment of said tax was without legal power or authority, and therefore void, then the money so collected belongs to the tax-payers who paid it.

In this case, as a conclusion of law, we say that the defendant is entitled to judgment.

Bated May 5, 1880. J. B. Tuttle, Circuit Judge.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1896: 11898: 11912: 11925: 11967: 118962026peak 1896 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Union Tp. v. Oakdale Tp.1911 OK 115, 120 P. 968
  2. Joseph v. Township of Grand Blanc147 N.W.2d 458 (Mich. Ct. App. 1967)
  3. Gay v. Thomas1896 OK 67, 46 P. 578
  4. Sweet v. Boyd1898 OK 22, 52 P. 939
  5. School District of Saginaw v. School District No. 6 of Buena Vista204 N.W. 737 (Mich. 1925)

Most recent

  1. Joseph v. Township of Grand Blanc147 N.W.2d 458 (Mich. Ct. App. 1967)
  2. School District of Saginaw v. School District No. 6 of Buena Vista204 N.W. 737 (Mich. 1925)
  3. Union Tp. v. Oakdale Tp.1911 OK 115, 120 P. 968
  4. Sweet v. Boyd1898 OK 22, 52 P. 939
  5. Gay v. Thomas1896 OK 67, 46 P. 578

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list