TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Duncombe v. Richards

Stephen W. Duncombe, adm'r v. James S. Richards et ux.

Duncombe v. Richards, 11 N.W. 186 (Mich. 1881)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Michigan Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 5, 1881
Citations
11 N.W. 18647 Mich. 6461881 Mich. LEXIS 489
Headnotes
Gommismnm's' fees — Taxation of costs. Commissioners’ fees should be taxed in the lower court; and should not be taxed in gross. Charges for copy and for the testimony of a party should not be allowed in taxing costs except upon a proper affidavit of disbursements.
Summary
Mandamus to compel re-taxation of costs.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

Mcmdctmus. The taxation of commissioners’ fees in gross was improper. Besides they should have been taxed in the court below. The charges for briefs, if the several amounts were not too large, may stand. The charges of $10 for copy and $10 for testimony of Biehards should only have been allowed on a proper affidavit of disbursements.

Matter referred back to taxing officer.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list