Clark v. Mitchell
Anna Clark v. Mary Mitchell, adm'x
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Coolet, J.
In this case two of the justices present think the judgment should be affirmed and the other does not. The case is complicated and it has been found impossible to reach any conclusion that will settle any controlling principle. Under these Circumstances written opinions could not be of service and are withheld.
The judgment will stand affirmed but without costs.
Maeston, J. concurred.
Concurrence
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Campbell, J.
I concur in the entrance of the judgment, as a majority are not in favor of reversal.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.