Irwin v. Schlief
David Irwin v. Michael Schlief
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Marston, J.
This case was tried by the court without a jury. A bill of exceptions was settled, but no written finding of facts was asked for or made. Exceptions were taken to rulings made upon the admissibility of certain testimony, but no reference whatever is made thereto in the brief of counsel. We must assume therefore that they have been abandoned. The argument submitted is upon the merits, based upon facts appearing in the bill of exceptions. It is almost needless to say that this court cannot review the facts or evidence in the case. As no question has therefore been presented to this Court which we can consider, the judgment must be affirmed with costs.
The other Justices concurred.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.