TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

York v. Ingham Circuit Judge

Bertrand D. York v. Ingham Circuit Judge

York v. Ingham Circuit Judge, 57 Mich. 421 (1885)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Michigan Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 17, 1885
Citations
57 Mich. 421
Headnotes
Mandamus — Motion to vacate decree. A chancery decree is not to he set aside on a mere motion, and if so set aside mandamus lies to vacate the action, hut without prejudice to the right which any party may have had to proceed in a regular way.
Summary
Mandamus. Relator seeks in this proceeding to set aside the action of respondent in vacating, upon motion, a chancery decree entered by him sixteen months before. In answer to the order to show cause, respondent states that he signed the decree, as he supposed, without reading it, and under an impression that it was satisfactory to counsel for all parties. The decree recited that all the material averments of the bill' were true as alleged, but it was also declared to be without prejudice to defendants’ right to file a bill of their own, it being the judge’s opinion that they could not otherwise fully protect their rights. The subsequent order purported to restore the parties to their original situation in all respects, as if no decree had been made, and to leave the answer filed by them, and allowed to be withdrawn,' to stand as the answer to the original bill of complaint.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

The Court is of opinion that the decree in this case could not properly be thus set aside on mere motion.

The writ will therefore issue, but without prejudice to any right the parties, or any of them, may have had at the time the action complained of was taken, to take proceedings in the regular way.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1905: 119052026peak 1905 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Vincent v. Benzie Circuit Judge102 N.W. 369 (Mich. 1905)

Most recent

  1. Vincent v. Benzie Circuit Judge102 N.W. 369 (Mich. 1905)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list