TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

People v. Seller

The People v. Henry Seller

People v. Seller, 25 N.W. 304 (Mich. 1885)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Michigan Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 28, 1885
Judges
Campbell, Other
Citations
25 N.W. 30458 Mich. 3271885 Mich. LEXIS 527
Disposition
Reversed as to excess.
Headnotes
Horsestealing. 1. The punishment provided for horse-stealing by How. Stat. § 9180 can onty be imposed when the information or indictment is expressly based on the statute; and where that is not the case the excess beyond the ordinary penalty for larceny will be remitted on review by reversing the judgment to that extent. 2. Whether the theft of other property besides a horse can be included in an information based on the special statute imposing an excessive penalty for that offense — Q.
Summary
Error to Ottawa. (Arnold, J.) Information for horse-stealing. Respondent brings error.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Campbell

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Campbell, J.

Respondent, under an ordinary charge of larceny, of a horse, buggy and harness of the value of <¡M?5, *328 pleaded guilty, and was sentenced to imprisonment in the State prison for eight years. Error is brought because of excessive sentence.

As the law now stands a sentence which is merely bad for excess may be reversed for the excess, and left to stand for so much as could lawfully be imposed. It is probable that the sentence was intended to be given under the Act of 1877 (IIow. Stat. § 9180) relating to horse-stealing. It was held in Boody v. People 43 Mich. 34 , and People v. Jones 49 Mich. 591 , that the excessive punishment imposed by that statute could only be given when the information or indictment was based upon it. That was not the case here, and other articles were included in the charge. The Attorney General confesses error as to all of the sentence beyond five years, and

The judgment must be reversed to that extent.

The other Justices concurred.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1892: 11913: 11929: 118922026peak 1892 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Arnold v. State1913 OK CR 381, 132 P. 1123
  2. People v. Reggel8 Utah 21 (1892)
  3. State v. Kingen226 N.W. 505 (N.D. 1929)

Most recent

  1. State v. Kingen226 N.W. 505 (N.D. 1929)
  2. Arnold v. State1913 OK CR 381, 132 P. 1123
  3. People v. Reggel8 Utah 21 (1892)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
People v. Jones, 14 N.W. 573 (Mich. 1883) 7
Boody v. People, 4 N.W. 549 (Mich. 1880) 6

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list