TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

McKinnon v. Atkins

Alexander McKinnon v. Eugene Atkins

McKinnon v. Atkins, 27 N.W. 564 (Mich. 1886)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Michigan Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 8, 1886
Judges
Champlin, Other
Citations
27 N.W. 56460 Mich. 4181886 Mich. LEXIS 600
Disposition
Case dismissed.
Headnotes
Case made — Circuit court rule Sj requires statement of errors to be filed— Failure to except to order of court directing judgment, or to assign error thereon, necessitates dismissal of case. 1. Where a case is certified to the Supreme Court under circuit court rule 84, a statement of the errors relied on should be filed as provided for in that rule. 2. Where a case made is agreed upon by the parties, and the circuit judge directs judgment to be entered thereon in favor of the plaintiff, the failure of tlie defendant to except to such order, or assign error thereon, is fatal to his right to a review of the judgment in this Court, and the case will be dismissed. [Brief confined to a discussion of the case on the merits. Deportee.]
Summary
Case made before judgment from Clare. (Hart, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion. This is a case made before judgment, and was certified to this Court under circuit court rule 84, but the required statement of errors was not filed.' No exception was taken to the order of the circuit judge directing judgment for the plaintiff, nor is any error assigned thereon. The failure to serve such statement has been overlooked by this Court where exceptions were duly taken to the findings of the circuit judge and appeared in the record : Perkins v. Nugent, 45 Mich. 156; but in this case there is nothing in the record showing any exceptions on the part of the defendant, or, in fact, any question for the consideration of the Court.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Champlin

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Champlin, J.

This cause purports to be a case made before judgment. It appears to have been certified to this Court under rule 84 of the circuit court rules.

That rule reqnires'a statement of errors to be filed, which has not been done.

The record does not show that any exception was taken to the order of the circuit judge directing a judgment for plaintiff, nor is there any error assigned.

The plaintiff in his brief relies upon these errors and irregularities, and they cannot be overlooked. An order must be entered dismissing the case out of this Court.

The other Justices concurred.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1909: 11915: 119092026peak 1909 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Williams Bros. Lumber Co. v. Kelly122 N.W. 646 (S.D. 1909)
  2. Seubert v. Fawick Tractor Co.154 N.W. 446 (S.D. 1915)

Most recent

  1. Seubert v. Fawick Tractor Co.154 N.W. 446 (S.D. 1915)
  2. Williams Bros. Lumber Co. v. Kelly122 N.W. 646 (S.D. 1909)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list