Gore v. Ray
George P. Gore v. Hiram W. Ray
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Long, J.
This is a proceeding upon a petition to a circuit court commissioner of Berrien county to dissolve a writ of attachment.
The proceedings, after hearing before the commissioner, were removed by appeal to the circuit court for said county, and, upon a hearing there by the court before a jury, the attachment was dissolved. The respondent brings the cause to this Court on a writ of error.
This writ is not the proper remedy. It is not a proceeding according to the course of the common law, but is a special proceeding under the statute. Gray v. York, 44 Mich. 415 ( 6 N. W. Rep. 874 ). The writ of error must be dismissed.
The other Justices concurred.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.