TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Ross v. Barber

George W. Ross v. James B. Barber, Recorder of Bay City

Ross v. Barber, 49 N.W. 35 (Mich. 1891)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Michigan Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 10, 1891
Citations
49 N.W. 3586 Mich. 380
Headnotes
Municipal corporations — Change of boundaries — Offices—Vacancy. The provision, of the charter of Bay Oity that the office of aider-man shall become vacant on the removal of the incumbent from his ward applies to a removal effected by a change of the boundaries of the wards by the Legislature as well as to a voluntary removal of the alderman.
Summary
Mandamus. Relator applied for mandamus to compel the drawing of an order in his favor for salary as an alderman of the Fifth ward of Bay City. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

The present Legislature changed the boundaries of the wards of Bay City.

Previous to such change, relator was an alderman of the Fifth ward, and a resident therein. By the change of boundaries relator is no longer a resident of the Fifth ward, but now resides in the Fourth ward, as reconstructed by the Legislature, which is separated from the Fifth by the Eighth ward. The office of alderman, by the charter, becomes vacant by the removal of the aider-man from his ward.

We think the removal provided for applies to removals by change of boundaries by the Legislature as well as a *381 voluntary removal by the alderman. The reasons apply equally to either mode of removal. In either case the office is vacant.

We do not determine the right of the mayor to fill the vacancy by appointment. Stow v. Common Council, 79 Mich. 595 .

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1931: 119312026peak 1931 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Olsen v. Merrill5 P.2d 226 (Utah 1931)

Most recent

  1. Olsen v. Merrill5 P.2d 226 (Utah 1931)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Stow v. Common Council of Grand Rapids, 44 N.W. 1047 (Mich. 1890) 8

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list