Township of Cumming v. Schick
The Township of Cumming v. Joseph Schick
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Montgomery, J.
The record in this case contains the testimony offered on the trial and the judgment. No exceptions were taken to rulings on the trial, but it is sought to review the conclusion of the trial judge upon the whole testimony, though no findings of fact or of law were requested. Under these circumstances we cannot review the conclusions reached by the trial judge. We have no means of knowing definitely the grounds upon which the trial judge proceeded. The defeated party has not a right to a trial de novo in this Court. The case is ruled by Haines v. Saviers, 93 Mich. 440 , and cases cited.
Judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The other Justices concurred.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 8 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.