TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Thomas v. Gartner

John H. Thomas and Charles Cameron v. George Gartner and George S. Hosmer, Circuit Judges of Wayne County

Thomas v. Gartner, 57 N.W. 188 (Mich. 1893)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Michigan Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 18, 1893
Citations
57 N.W. 18897 Mich. 608
Cited by 3
Headnotes
Creditor's bill — Appointment of receiver — Mandamus. 1. Mandamus is not the proper remedy by which to review an appealable order in a chancery suit. 2. Irregularity in the appointment of a receiver under a judgment creditor’s bill is no ground for defendant’s objecting to an examination concerning his property and effects; citing Howard v. Palmer, Walk. Ch. 391.
Summary
Mandamus. Relators, the defendants in a judgment creditor’s bill, applied for mandamus to'compel the respondents to vacate orders appointing a receiver, and requiring them to appear before a circuit court commissioner for examination. For a full statement .of facts, see Dutton v. Thomas, 97 Mich. 93.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

An order to show cause is denied. Mandamus is not a proper remedy to review an appealable order in a chancery case; nor is their regularity of the appointment of a receiver under a judgment creditor’s bill any *609 reason for the defendants objecting to an examination concerning their property and effects. Howard v. Palmer, Walk. Ch. 391.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 3 cases

View all citing references →
1898: 11906: 11924: 118982026peak 1898 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Mardian v. Wayne Circuit Judge76 N.W. 497 (Mich. 1898)
  2. Michigan Public Utilities Commission v. Michigan State Telephone Co.200 N.W. 749 (Mich. 1924) · Dissent
  3. Nichol v. Murphy108 N.W. 704 (Mich. 1906)

Most recent

  1. Michigan Public Utilities Commission v. Michigan State Telephone Co.200 N.W. 749 (Mich. 1924) · Dissent
  2. Nichol v. Murphy108 N.W. 704 (Mich. 1906)
  3. Mardian v. Wayne Circuit Judge76 N.W. 497 (Mich. 1898)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list