Haney v. Russell
William O. Haney v. Fred J. Russell, Circuit Judge of Muskegon County
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
McGrath, C. J.
Relator brought trespass qu. cl. in the circuit. He was not in actual possession, and, in his declaration, set up title in himself. He recovered a judgment of $47.50, whereupon the court entered judgment in favor of defendant for costs. Relator asks for a mandamus to compel the court to vacate the order granting costs to defendant.
The order was a final judgment. All of the facts upon which the application is based are matters of record, and relator has another ample and specific remedy. The ques *393 tion is reviewable upon writ of error. McFarlane v. Ray, 14 Mich. 465 ; Singer Manfg. Co. v. Benjamin, 55 Id. 330.
We think the application must be denied.
The other Justices concurred.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.