In re Chandler
In the Matter of Albert L. Chandler
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Pbr Curiam.
The respondent is an attorney, licensed to practice in this Court, and the'present proceeding .is based upon information furnished to the judge of the circuit court for the county of Shiawassee.' The nature df the charges was such that the circuit judge could not have done less than to direct an examination. into the facts alleged.- This has been had. The case was referred to a circuit court commissioner of Shiawassee county to take testimony, and on the coming in of the report the Attorney General states that, after an examination of the case, he is satisfied that the charges are not sustained by the proofs. We have, however, deemed it due both to the Court and to Mr. Chandler that the testimony should be examined by the Court. The reputation of an attorney for integrity and fidelity to the interests of his client constitute his capital in business, and where such reputation .■ is assailéd it is his right that an authoritative determination of the question fact be made by the court. After a careful exiamination of the testimony, we are convinced .that Mr. Chandler should be fully acquitted of the charges. • • ...
The proceedings will be dismissed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.