TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Sherwood v. Commissioner of State Land Office

Sherwood v. Comm'r of State Land Office, 113 Mich. 227 (1897)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Michigan Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 28, 1897
Judges
Hooker, Other
Citations
113 Mich. 227
Headnotes
1. Waters — Island in Great Lakes — Title. The fee to an unsurveyed island in one of the Great Lakes, situated several hundred feet distant from the mainland, is in the State, and not in the riparian owner. 2. Same — Lake Huron — What Waters Within. An island lying contiguous to the mainland of the Upper Peninsula, between Detour Passage and St. Joseph Island, is within the waters of Lake Huron, and not in St. Mary’s river.
Summary
Mandamus by William L. Sherwood against William A. French, commissioner of the state land office, and James T. Bennett, to compel the respondent commissioner to execute a conveyance of certain lands to the relator.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Hooker

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Hooker, J.

The relator asks a mandamus to compel a conveyance by the state land commissioner to him, as purchaser, of a small, unsurveyed island, lying contiguous to, and 600 feet distant from, the mainland of the Upper Peninsula, between Detour Passage and St. Joseph Island, at or near the north end of Lake Huron. Upon the one hand, viz., by the relator, it is contended that this island is situated in Lake Huron; upon the other, that it lies in St. Mary’s river, and is, therefore, owned by the proprietor of the adjoining land, who is said to own to the thread of the stream. We are of the opinion that this island is within the body of water known as Lake Huron, *228 and therefore that the case is within the'rule of People v. Silberwood, 110 Mich. 103 .

The writ should issue, and it will be so ordered.

The other Justices concurred.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1899: 11907: 11909: 118992026peak 1899 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Ainsworth v. Munoskong Hunting & Fishing Club123 N.W. 802 (Mich. 1909)
  2. Brown v. Milliman78 N.W. 785 (Mich. 1899)
  3. Bishop v. Baldwin110 N.W. 139 (Mich. 1907)

Most recent

  1. Ainsworth v. Munoskong Hunting & Fishing Club123 N.W. 802 (Mich. 1909)
  2. Bishop v. Baldwin110 N.W. 139 (Mich. 1907)
  3. Brown v. Milliman78 N.W. 785 (Mich. 1899)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
People v. Silberwood, 32 L.R.A. 694 (Mich. 1896) 18

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list