TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Fisher v. Hardwood Manufacturing Co.

Fisher v. Hardwood Mfg. Co., 79 N.W. 693 (Mich. 1899)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Michigan Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 28, 1899
Judges
Grant, Other
Citations
79 N.W. 693120 Mich. 4901899 Mich. LEXIS 970
Disposition
Reversed.
Headnotes
Justices op the Peace — Log-Lien Proceedings — Service Upon Owner — Waiver op Defects. Where the owner of logs attached in proceedings under the log-lien law appears before the justice on an adjourned day, pleads the general issue, and goes to trial upon the merits, he waives the right to object that service was not made upon him until the return day of the writ.
Summary
Error to Bay; Maxwell,. J. Proceedings under the log-lien law by Samuel Eisher against the Hardwood Manufacturing Company, Limited, and Nathan B. Bradley. Erom a judgment for defendant Bradley on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error. This suit was commenced in justice’s court by attachment to enforce a lien for labor. The work was done for the defendant the Hardwood Manufacturing Company, and defendant Bradley claimed to be the owner of the property attached. Service was made upon defendant Bradley on the morning of the return day of the writ. Bradley did not appear. Three adjournments were had without his appearance. On the last adjourned day Bradley appeared by his attorney, declaration was filed, plea of the general issue entered by both defendants, case adjourned, trial had upon the adjourned day upon the merits, and judgment rendered for plaintiff. Defendant Bradley took a general appeal. Upon the trial in the circuit court, without the introduction of any testimony, the court directed a verdict for the defendant, on the ground that the justice obtained no jurisdiction.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Grant

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Grant, C. J.

(after stating the facts). The cases of Noyes v. Hillier, 65 Mich. 636 , and Newbauer v. Newbauer, 112 Mich. 562 , have no application. In those cases the defendant did not appear. In this case the jurisdictional defects were waived by a general appearance, plea of the general issue, and trial upon the merits. Manhard v. Schott, 37 Mich. 234 ; Dailey v. Kennedy, 64 Mich. 211 .

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered.

The other Justices concurred.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1923: 119232026peak 1923 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Hempel v. Bay Circuit Judge193 N.W. 281 (Mich. 1923)

Most recent

  1. Hempel v. Bay Circuit Judge193 N.W. 281 (Mich. 1923)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Dailey v. Kennedy, 31 N.W. 125 (Mich. 1887) 16
Manhard v. Schott, 37 Mich. 234 (1877) 15
Noyes v. Hillier, 32 N.W. 872 (Mich. 1887) 7
Newbauer v. Newbauer, 70 N.W. 1104 (Mich. 1897) 1

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list