TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

People v. Tracy

People v. Tracy, 80 N.W. 21 (Mich. 1899)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Michigan Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 19, 1899
Judges
Grant, Hooker, Long, Montgomery, Moore
Citations
80 N.W. 21121 Mich. 3181899 Mich. LEXIS 573
Disposition
Affirmed.
Cited by 3
Headnotes
Burglary — Evidence. • Upon a prosecution for burglary, evidence that a set of harness, a bridle, and large horse blankets belonging to the complaining witness, a farmer, living 20 and 40 rods, respectively, from his nearest neighbors on either side, were in his barn when night set in, and were gone when he went to do the chores early in the morning, but after daylight, is sufficient to support a finding that the taking was in the night-time.
Summary
Exceptions before judgment from Hillsdale; Chester, J. "Willis E. Tracy was convicted of burglary. The information in this case contains two counts, the first charging burglary and the second larceny. Respondent was convicted on the first count, which alleged the commission of the crime on October 28, 1896. The property stolen consisted of two large horse blankets, a set of single harness, a bridle, and a pair of hopples. The property was in the buildings when night set in. The owner rose early in the morning, and the property was gone. In March, 1898, some of the property was found secreted on respondent’s premises, and the people produced testimony tending to show that it had been used by him, and that when it was found he denied ever having seen it before. He gave testimony tending to prove an alibi. The jury must have found that this testimony was false, and that the witness who gave it committed perjury. The owner of the property was a farmer. Another farmer lived within 20 rods on one side, and another within 40 rods upon the other side.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Grant

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Grant, C. J.

(after stating the facts). It is contended that there is no evidence that the crime was committed in the night-time. While the locus of this crime was not in a city, as was the case in People v. Dupree, 98 Mich. 28 , yet we think that case controls this. The owner testified that he did his chores early in the morning, but it was after daylight, and he then discovered that the property was gone. The property was bulky, and it is not probable that one would run the risk of breaking into a building situated as these were, in daylight, and of carrying away property of this character. The chance of detection would be too great. The question was for the jury.

While counsel for respondent argue other phases of the case, they close their brief by stating that there is, after all, but this one question in the case. We agree with them, and refrain from discussing the other points.

The conviction is affirmed, and, if sentence has not been imposed, the case will be remanded, with instructions to proceed to sentence.

Montgomery, Hooker, and Moore, JJ., concurred. Long, J., did not sit.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 3 cases

View all citing references →
1905: 11913: 11922: 119052026peak 1905 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. People v. Danenberg142 N.W. 347 (Mich. 1913)
  2. State v. Richards81 P. 142 (Utah 1905)
  3. People v. Williams207 P. 255 (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)

Most recent

  1. People v. Williams207 P. 255 (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  2. People v. Danenberg142 N.W. 347 (Mich. 1913)
  3. State v. Richards81 P. 142 (Utah 1905)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
People v. Dupree, 56 N.W. 1046 (Mich. 1893) 8

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list