Dages v. Sanilac Circuit Judge
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
This is an application for a mandamus to compel the circuit judge to vacate an order quashing a writ of replevin with costs. The order was a final one, and reviewable on error. The papers on which the order was based were matters of record. Jewell v. Lamoreaux, 30 Mich. 155 ; Pingree v. Steere, 68 Mich. 204 . The case is unlike People v. Bay Circuit Judge, 41 Mich. 326 . In that case the application was to vacate an order *491 quashing an attachment. The writ contained the usual summons clause, which defendant was still bound to answer, and the case was not dismissed. The order was not, therefore, final. In the present case the order was final, and reviewable on error. See Olson v. Muskegon Circuit Judge, 49 Mich. 85 ; Orth v. Montcalm Circuit Judge, McGrath, Mand. Cas. No. 717.
The writ will be denied on this ground.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 11 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.