TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Ambos v. Ingham Circuit Judge

Ambos v. Ingham Circuit Judge, 82 N.W. 267 (Mich. 1900)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Michigan Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 3, 1900
Judges
Grant, Other
Citations
82 N.W. 267123 Mich. 6181900 Mich. LEXIS 876
Headnotes
Mandamus — Refusal of Judge to Enter Decree. While mandamus would lie to compel a circuit judge to decide a suit in chancery in which he should refuse to sign any decree, the writ cannot be invoked to compel him to enter the specific decree which relator desires.
Summary
Mandamus by William J. Ambos to compel Howard Wiest, circuit judge of Ingham county, to enter a decree of divorce in favor of relator. Relator filed a bill for divorce against his wife. The bill was filed November 9th. The jurat bears date November 4th, and the petitioner says that he cannot say whether it was actually sworn to on that day or some later day. On November 4th complainant also made an affidavit, entitled in the cause, to the effect that the defendant was not a resident of Michigan, but was a resident of the city of Columbus, Ohio. Upon this the court made an order of publication, which order was properly served upon the defendant at Columbus, Ohio, in accordance with Act No. 210 of the Public Acts of 1899. A default was duly entered, proofs taken in open court, and the judge took the case under advisement. He subsequently notified complainant’s solicitor by letter (the solicitor residing in Detroit) that a decree of divorce would not be granted, because the affidavit of residence was made several days before the bill was filed and the' order of publication made. Relator now applies for the writ of mandamus to compel the circuit judge to sign a decree giving him a divorce.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Grant

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Grant, J.

(after stating the facts). We may infer that no decree dismissing the bill has been entered. This court will not compel a circuit judge to sign a particular decree. If he refuses to sign any, the writ of mandamus would issue to compel him to decide the case and enter such decree as he thinks is proper. Respondent returns that he is satisfied from the proofs that the material allegations of the bill of complaint are true. Chancery cases are heard de novo in this court, and, if the case were here on appeal, we might not concur in the conclusion reached by the circuit judge. The circuit judge has not refused to enter a decree, but has refused to enter such a decree as complainant wants. If the learned judge thinks that the circuit court had no jurisdiction, it is his duty to enter a decree dismissing the bill, whereupon relator could appeal, and the case would be before us on the jurisdictional question raised, and also upon the merits. The writ of mandamus cannot be invoked to compel the court helow to enter a specific decree.

The writ is denied.

The other Justices concurred.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1903: 11910: 11942: 119032026peak 1903 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Steel v. Clinton Circuit Judge95 N.W. 993 (Mich. 1903)
  2. Stevens v. Wayne Circuit Judge125 N.W. 695 (Mich. 1910)
  3. Smolenski v. Kent Probate Judge2 N.W.2d 900 (Mich. 1942) · Dissent

Most recent

  1. Smolenski v. Kent Probate Judge2 N.W.2d 900 (Mich. 1942) · Dissent
  2. Stevens v. Wayne Circuit Judge125 N.W. 695 (Mich. 1910)
  3. Steel v. Clinton Circuit Judge95 N.W. 993 (Mich. 1903)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list