Harmon v. Metcalfe
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Grant, J.
(after stating the facts). Prior to 1899, the defeated party in chancery cases was required, as a condition of his appeal, to give a bond conditioned for the performance or satisfaction of the decree. 1 Comp. Laws, § 550. That section was amended by the legislature of 1899 (Pub. Acts 1899, Act No. 243), providing that:
“ The court from whose decree said appeal shall be taken and perfected shall not stay proceedings in said cause for a longer period than until said appeal shall have been taken and perfected- unless the party taking such appeal shall, within Such time, file with the register of said court a bond to the appellee or appellees, with sufficient surety or sureties, to be approved by a circuit judge or circuit court commissioner of said county, and with such penalty as such judge or commissioner shall approve, conditioned for the performance or satisfaction of the decree or final' order of the Supreme Court in the cause, and payment of all costs of the appellee or appellees in the matter of appeal.”
The evident purpose of this amendment was two-fold:
(1) To permit appeals in chancery without giving a bond
(2) to permit the appellee to proceed to enforce his decree as in suits at law, unless a bond for stay of proceedings be given. The appellee, as in suits at law, assumes the risk of reversal in the appellate court, and the proceedings subsequent to decree are, of course, void if the decree is reversed. If affirmed, the appellee saves time, which may be of con-, siderable value to him.
Section 463, 1 Comp. Laws, provides for an enrollment of the decree after 30 day's “if no appeal therefrom shall have been entered in the minutes of the court.” This provision is the same as in the statute of 1846. Rev. Stat. 1846, tit. 21, chap. 90, § 58. No claim of appeal was necessary. Covell v. Mosely, 15 Mich. 514 . The bond was the only paper to be filed. The bond stayed all further proceedings in the circuit court. Whether section 463 refers to entering the bond or entering the fact that an ‘ appeal had been taken is of no consequence. The act of 1899, doing away with the bond, and permitting further proceedings in the circuit court, is a modification of section 463, *645 and authorizes an enrollment, though the appeal be entered in the minutes of the court. It is true that an appeal transfers the cause to this court, to be heard de novo; but it is the same case that was heard in the lower court, and the decree is there entered in the journal of the court. The legislature may properly provide for proceedings in the lower court after appeal without bond. Having so done, it follows that the appellee is entitled to the enrollment in the court below as a part of the proceedings subsequent to decree. The papers, after enrollment, will be returned to this court.
Motion granted.
The other Justices concurred.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.